Gold Country Bail Bonds Just another WordPress site

Understanding the New Conduct Credit Laws

A new law went into effect on January 25, 2010 (SB X3 18) that changes the credits most defendants receive while serving time in a California jail. Previously defendants had to serve two-thirds of their jail sentence. The new rule means they only serve half of the sentence. As always certain restrictions apply. I have researched this issue and put together this brief outline of the changes. This is for information purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice.

Penal Code §4019 (a) (1) &(4) provide for conduct credits earned for “good time” and “work time” of pre-sentence incarceration in a county jail facility or state prison. (CDCR) Subdivision (a) (1) also allows for these credits to apply post-sentence for incarceration in a county jail.

Determining eligibility, the new rules for custody credits apply to most defendants, some exceptions are;

1. Registered sex offenders.
2. Serving time / convicted of a violent felony listed in Penal Code §667.5 (c).
3. Persons with a prior violent felony conviction.
4. Pre-sentence credit for a person sentenced to the state prison for a life term.
5. Persons serving post-sentence time on an alternative sentencing program.

All eligible defendants will now receive two days of additional credit for every two days of “actual jail custody time” that they serve. I.e. a defendant sentenced to 60 days in jail will serve 30 days of actual jail time. Previously two thirds were required to be served, reducing a sentence by one-third for good time / work time credits.

The formula for determining time served credit is much simpler with the new revisions to Penal Code §4019. Days credited are deducted for each four day period in which a person is confined. Subdivision (f) provides that four days have been served for every two days spent in “actual custody”.

There is controversy brewing over the application of the new statute’s changes to county jail commitments and has prompted the introduction of two bills that are now pending in the Legislature to limit application of the formula increasing credits earned to only inmates committed to state prison. You should follow the pending legislation to keep current on any and all changes that may affect the way custody credits are calculated.

As of April 2010 there is a split in appellate decisions whether the new changes to Penal Code §4019 apply retroactively to pre-sentence custody credit calculations when a defendant was sentenced prior to the January 25, 2010 change in the statute. Three cases, People v. Brown, People v. House, and People v. Landon, (all 2010 cases) all held that the defendant is entitled to the new “half time” calculation. One case People v. Rodriguez reached a contrary conclusion. A hinge point seems to be Penal Code §3 specifying that no part of the Penal Code is retroactive “unless expressly so declared”. Once again it’s important to keep current on the changes and decisions made on this issue. Always consult with legal counsel to be sure you have the most current information.

Searches and Search Warrants

Every person has a Constitutional right protecting them against unreasonable searches and seizures. (Fourth Amendment) The Fourth Amendment was ratified as a means to guard against abuse of the writ of assistance, better defined as a “general search warrant” in the American Revolutionary times. The Fourth Amendment specifies all searches and arrest warrants be sanctioned judicially, and supported by probable cause. In 1961 the Supreme Court ruled the 4th Amendment to applicable by way of Due Process outlined in the Fourteenth Amendment.

The 4th Amendment specifically only applies to government employees, and does not protect you from searches and seizures (reasonable or unreasonable) conducted by a private citizen, and only applies to criminal law with no protection under this amendment for civil law.

The Supreme Court has ruled that searches and seizures can violate the reasonableness required pursuant to the 4th Amendment in certain cases. However, not all actions by governmental authorities to obtain or collect information and evidence on a person constitute a search. The actions of governmental authorities are what trigger the protections guaranteed pursuant to the 4th Amendment. If no search occurred, there may be no necessity (requirement) for a warrant. On the contrary if a search occurred there may be a necessity (requirement) for a warrant.

In 1968 the Supreme Court ruled that in certain circumstances police officers (governmental employees) can conduct limited warrant-less searches with suspicion levels less than that of probable cause in certain circumstances. In certain situations officers may conduct a “pat down search”. This activity is primarily done for the safety of the officer (s) and to determine if a “suspect” has a weapon of some sort. An officer needs to articulate specific facts in order to justify their actions; a vague hunch does not work.

The 4th Amendment mandates a law enforcement officer receive permission from a court of law (Judge or Magistrate) in order to lawfully search and seize evidence in the course of investigating a crime. The permission granted by the court is called a warrant. When a law enforcement officer conducts a search and seizure without a lawfully issued warrant it may be considered unreasonable and or unconstitutional. However there are certain exceptions that allow un-warranted searches and seizures.

Prior to 1914 evidence was allowed to be admitted into a criminal case no matter how it was obtained. The Supreme Court adopted the “exclusionary rule” in Weeks vs. United States. Other decisions came shortly after giving further protection of the 4th Amendment. One such ruling dealt with tips resulting from illegally obtained evidence is also inadmissible in trials, known as “fruit of the poisonous tree”. The main function of this protection is to deter law enforcement officers from violating suspects 4th Amendment rights.

Through the years courts have established exceptions to the warrant requirements, for example:
Plain view, with probable cause and a reason to be present an officer may seize objects that are in “plain view”.

Open field, fields, water, woodlands etc. may be searchable without a warrant. The expectation of privacy level is far less than that of a person’s home, person or vehicle. The Supreme Court has ruled in a 1924 case that the 4th Amendment protection does not extend to open fields.

Curtilage, the outdoor area’s immediately surrounding a home may be protected, and considered an extension of a person’s home. Therefore subject to privacy protections afforded in the 4th Amendment. To fall outside of the realm of cartilage interpretation there may need to be a great distance, fence, plants, etc to separate the area and be considered an open field.

Exigent circumstances, an exception to the warrant requirement may be an exigent circumstance. This happens when a law enforcement officer reasonably believes there is a need to protect life or property. When a search is not motivated by intent to arrest or obtain evidence an un-warranted search may not violate persons 4th Amendment rights.

Vehicles, persons in automobiles generally have a lesser expectation of privacy. A vehicle usually does not serve as a person’s residence or repository of personal belongings. A law enforcement officer needs some sort of probable cause and a reasonable belief the vehicle, occupants, and/or contents are connected with criminal activity. As a general rule items in “plain view” may be seized with out a warrant.
Searches at time of arrest, its common and has been found to not violate the 4th Amendment to search an individual incident to an arrest. Two major factors come into play, 1. Officer safety, the officer needs to check for weapons. 2. Preservation of evidence, the officer needs to gain control of evidence to prevent destruction by the arrested party.

Example; It’s reasonable for the officer to search the area within the arrestee's immediate control, that is, the area from which the defendant may gain access to a weapon or evidence. A search of the room in which the arrest is made is therefore permissible, but the same is not true of a search of other rooms, as the arrestee would not probably be able to access weapons or evidence in those rooms at the time of arrest.
Borders & Airports, a person, vehicle, and personal effects may be searched without a warrant at any United States boarder or international airport. The “border search” exception even relaxes the necessity for probable cause. While at a border crossing or international airport any person may be searched at random with virtually no violation of his/her 4th Amendment rights. However a search that intrudes on a person’s dignity and privacy must be supported by reasonable suspicion.

Misc. exceptions, some of the other exceptions used for the basis of a warrant less search are; Public Schools, Government Offices, Jail and Prison Cells, Searches Made With Consent.

Fourth Amendment protection does not apply to an arrest and or seizure by a private person. (Citizens Arrest) Most states have laws governing the specific circumstances when a private person may arrest another. Some general examples of when a private person would make an arrest would be when a felony or misdemeanor crime has been committed and possibly witnessed by the arresting citizen. The arresting citizen should have a reasonable belief that the person arrested has committed the crime. A private person making a citizens arrest has no qualified immunity and may face a civil lawsuit if they’re mistaken.

This information has been provided as a reference, and should in no way be relied upon as legal advice. If you have questions or concerns of a specific matter you are encouraged to seek the advice of a competent attorney.

Want to become a Bounty Hunter Like "Dog"?

Well maybe not exactly like Dog, but a bounty hunter just the same.  The job of a bounty hunter is to arrest fugitives running from the law. It is a dangerous? Sometimes sure, but that's half the draw right? If you think that a career as a bounty hunter is right up your alley here are the steps needed to do it legally.

Advice: Fugitive Recovery agents come through our office all the time trying to get business. We have only used a few. If you want to get into this business be ready to bring something extraodinary to the table. You must be effective and be able to back it up time and time again. Remember, it takes years to build a great reputation, and only a day to ruin it. That being said, here are the legal requirements.

1. Complete a 40- training course at an accredited community college that teaches individuals how to become a Fugitive Recovery Agent. This course should include a course about the power of arrest course pursuant to Penal Code Section 832.
2. Complete a 12-hour, pre-licensing bail education course that is compliant with the Insurance Code Section 1810.7. Go to bailschool.com to see class schedules.
3. If you are planning on carrying a weapon you must complete the P.C. 832 Firearms course. You must obtain a firearms permit from your county sheriff and carry the permit with you wherever you go.
4. Complete an 8- hour course that focuses on duties of a security guard and the power to arrest.
5. Complete the training course successfully to become licensed.

After you have completed all the requirements above you can start make contacts in the bail industry and offer your services as a fugitive recovery agent. This business can be lucrative, it is competitive. In order to break into this business you must be persistent, resourceful, and able to bring results every time. Remember, the act of physically restraining the Fugitive and bringing him/her back into custody is only the end of the hunt. First you must convince a Bail Agent to entrust their liability to you, then find out where the Fugitive is residing. My advice is to plan your strategy on all these fronts before you start taking classes. Don't start this endeavor until you are sure you can stick with it for the long haul. Good Luck and Happy Hunting.

Your Miranda Rights

Your Miranda Rights, named after the 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona. If you have been charged with a criminal offense, you may likely benefit from consulting with a criminal defense lawyer. Compiled below are some basics concerning your right to remain silent, this information is exactly that, “information” and should not be relied upon as legal advice.

The police must advise suspects of their Miranda Rights, the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, the right to an appointed attorney if they can’t afford one, prior to conducting custodial interrogations of a suspect. However, If the suspect is not “under arrest” (i.e.: in police custody) there is no need for the police to warn a suspect of his/her Miranda Rights.
The police have become very aware of when they have to advise suspects of their Miranda Rights. Police may question a suspect, intentionally telling the suspect, "You are not under arrest at this time”. After the suspect answers questions voluntarily, sometimes even if he refuses, he is still arrested. The questioning being non-custodial may even be admissible in court. After the arrest the police may have no interest in further questioning, and therefore may never advise the suspect of his Miranda Rights.

How to Request Public Records

Many people don’t realize that you have a statutory right to inspect the majority of California's public records using the state's California Public Records Act (CPRA). The text of the CPRA is found in the California Government Code, sections 6250 & 6253, which states that any individual, corporation, partnership, firm or association, whether in or out of California, can inspect public records.

 Public records are known as the peoples business.  You’re not required to explain why you are making the request. There is an exception, if you request the disclosure of the address of any individual who has been arrested, or the current address of the victim of a crime, you must state whether the request is made for a journalistic, scholarly, political or governmental purpose, and declare that the information will not be used to sell a product or service. Also an agency may refuse to provide a record if, "the public interest served by not making the record public clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure of the record." [Cal. Gov't Code § 6255]. There are other exemptions that can be found in Cal. Gov’t Code § 6254. 

You can inspect all "public records" of the government bodies subject to the CPRA. The term "public records" is broadly defined to include information relating to the conduct of the public's business that is prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of what medium it is stored in. Keep in mind that public records will not extend to personal information of public officers deemed unrelated to the conduct of public business.

Making A Public Record Request 

Sierra National Forest Gun Laws

WELCOME to the Sierra National Forest.

These public lands are enjoyed by tens of thousands of people each year in a variety of activities. Certain regulations have been established to encourage visi- tors to have a safe visit to the forest. Regulations for safe shooting are to provide for safety, protection, and enjoyment of all forest visitors and for the natu- ral surroundings. As a recreation shooter using the Federal lands, it is your responsibility to conduct your sport safely. You must be aware of and comply with all state, county and federal laws pertaining to the possession and transportation of firearms and to do it without damage to other forest users and to the natural envi- ronment. There is private land within forest boundaries; per- mission must be obtained from the landowner to en- ter the land. Valid California hunting licenses are required when hunting in the Sierra National Forest. Know and follow all California State Fish and Game rules and regulations.